Cougar Revenger S (2017) vs Razer Basilisk (2017)

The Cougar Revenger S (2017) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Gaming Mouse for people with a $35 budget.

The Razer Basilisk (2017), however, is merely mediocre at its $49 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $35 and $70 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Cougar Revenger S (2017) and Razer Basilisk (2017), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:

The Cougar Revenger S (2017) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Mice for Esports in 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Budget Buyers", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

Moving on to the Razer Basilisk (2017): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Windows Central, TechSpot, PCmag, hardwarezone.com.sg, Tom's Guide, PC Gamer, PCWorld, and Rtings, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like PCmag, and learned that they all showed a preference for the Razer Basilisk (2017).

Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Gaming Mice received. We found that the Cougar Revenger S (2017) managed to earn a rating of 8.5 from kitguru.net, whereas the Razer Basilisk (2017) got its highest, 10, score from reviewers at Windows Central.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Mice on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Mice being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the Cougar Revenger S (2017) and Razer Basilisk (2017) managed averages of 8.3 and 8.7 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Cougar Revenger S (2017) vs. Razer Basilisk (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.