Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Cougar Revenger S (2017) vs Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014)
Cougar Revenger S (2017)

Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014)

The Cougar Revenger S (2017) makes for a good, if unremarkable Gaming Mouse for people with a $70 budget. The Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014), however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $70 price range - chances are that there are better options available.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Cougar Revenger S (2017) and Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014), however, we put together a summary of what we know:
The Cougar Revenger S (2017) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Mice for Esports in 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Budget Buyers", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014) - it impressed reviewers at inews.co.uk, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "8 best computer mice for work and gaming – how to pick between Apple, Microsoft and more" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Ranked 3 out of 8" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
Sources that tested and scored both products, like PCmag, haven't shown a preference for either in their reviews.
We also examined the available data to learn which sources liked these two Gaming Mice best and found that the Cougar Revenger S (2017) managed to get its highest, 8.5, review score from kitguru.net, whereas the Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014) got its best rating from Tom's Guide - 8.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Cougar Revenger S (2017) earned an average review score of 8.3 out of 10 points and the Razer DeathAdder Chroma (2014) received an average of 8.0, compared to the 7.5 average of Gaming Mice in general.
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing