Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Crock-pot Express Programmable Multi-Cookers (2018) vs Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018)
Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018)

Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018)

The Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018) was loved by reviewers at CNET, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The best graduation gifts for a first apartment" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 1 out of 7", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Returning to the Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018), Your Best Digs, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Ranked 2 out of 6" in its "The Best Pressure Cookers" roundup, which is quite a feat.
We also performed a thorough Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018) vs. Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Electric Pressure Cookers, including Top Ten Reviews, preferred the Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018) over the Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018).
Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018) turned out to be most loved by Top Ten Reviews, which gave it a score of 9, whereas the Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018) got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at TechGearLab.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Crock-pot Express Programmable 6-Quart Multi-Cooker (2018) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 7.8 out of 10, compared to the 7.2 overall average of Electric Pressure Cookers in general, whereas the Cuisinart CPC-600 Electric (2018) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.0.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing