Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Vitamix Smart System vs Cuisinart Hurricane CBT-2000 Blender (2015)
Cuisinart Hurricane Pro 3.5 Peak HP Blender (CBT-2000)
The Vitamix A2500 has done great in quite a few roundups from some of the most highly trusted sources available, such as Tom's Guide, Your Best Digs, Rtings, and TechGearLab, which perform high-quality in-depth testing. It got awarded the "The best smart blender" title by Tom's Guide, "Ranked 1 out of 9" by Your Best Digs, and "Ranked 1 out of 4" by Rtings in their respective roundups. Earning that much praise from such respected sources is undoubtedly an impressive accomplishment.
Taking a look at the Cuisinart Hurricane Pro 3.5 Peak HP Blender (CBT-2000), we found that it did great in numerous roundups from highly trusted sources that conduct objective in-depth testing, including Tom's Guide, TechGearLab, Your Best Digs, and Consumer Reports - it was named "The best blender for pulsing" by Tom's Guide, "Runner Up for Runner Up Blender" by TechGearLab, and "Ranked 2 out of 9" by Your Best Digs. A product that's held in such high regard by some of the most reliable sources on the internet should be considered by anyone that's in the market for a Countertop Blender at this price.
Sources that tested and scored both products, like TechGearLab, haven't shown a preference for either in their reviews.
We also examined the available data to learn which sources liked these two Countertop Blenders best and found that the Vitamix A2500 managed to get its highest, 10, review score from TechGearLab, whereas the Cuisinart Hurricane Pro 3.5 Peak HP Blender (CBT-2000) got its best rating from TechGearLab - 10.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Vitamix A2500 earned an average review score of 9.1 out of 10 points and the Cuisinart Hurricane Pro 3.5 Peak HP Blender (CBT-2000) received an average of 9.5, compared to the 7.3 average of Countertop Blenders in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing