Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Aukey SK-S1 (2017) vs Dali Katch (2016)
While the Aukey SK-S1 (2017) makes for a fairly good Portable Bluetooth Speaker for people with a $35 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Dali Katch (2016) to come to any reliable conclusions.
In either case, we suggest that you look at some other options before committing to one of these.
If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the Aukey SK-S1 (2017) and Dali Katch (2016), however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:
No sources that do their own in-depth testing have considered the Aukey SK-S1 (2017) to be a good enough purchase for it to earn a sport in their Portable Bluetooth Speaker roundups, which is typically a bad sign.
As for the Dali Katch (2016), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, Expert Reviews, TrustedReviews, and AVForums enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Portable Bluetooth Speakers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Aukey SK-S1 (2017) got its highest, 8, rating from TechHive, while the Dali Katch (2016) earned its best, 10, score from What Hi-Fi?.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Portable Bluetooth Speakers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Portable Bluetooth Speakers being 7.6 out of 10, whereas the Aukey SK-S1 (2017) and Dali Katch (2016) managed averages of 8.0 and 9.2 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Aukey SK-S1 (2017) vs. Dali Katch (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.