Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 2018 vs Asus ROG Swift PG279Q 2015
Both options make for good, if unremarkable, Monitors at the $1,100 budget range. While they should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into some other options at that price point.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Dell UltraSharp U4919DW and Asus ROG Swift PG279Q, however, we wrote-up what we know about them:
The Dell UltraSharp U4919DW has impressed reviewers from two sources that are among the most highly trusted on the internet, namely PCmag and Rtings. It did great in their objective hands-on roundups - it earned the "Best for Financial Analysts, Accountants, Statisticians" and "Runner Up for Best Ultrawide Monitor For Programming - Wider Alternative" awards from PCmag and Rtings, respectively. That's high praise from such reputable sources.
Moving on to the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q: it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like PC Gamer, TechSpot, Rtings, TrustedReviews, and Android Authority, enough for them to include them on those lists.
As for a direct Dell UltraSharp U4919DW vs. Asus ROG Swift PG279Q comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like TechSpot and Rtings. It turns out that all such sources consider the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Dell UltraSharp U4919DW most impressed reviewers at MonitorNerds - they gave it a score of 9.4, whereas the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q got rated best by Gadget Review - 9.1.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Dell UltraSharp U4919DW earned an average review score of 8.5 out of 10 points and the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q received an average of 8.5, compared to the 7.3 average of Monitors in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing