Denon AH-MM400 (2016) vs Sennheiser Urbanite (2014)

The Denon AH-MM400 (2016) makes for a good, if unremarkable, On-Ear Headphone for people with a $360 budget.

The Sennheiser Urbanite On Ear (2014), however, is merely mediocre at its $94 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $360 and $85 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Denon AH-MM400 (2016) and Sennheiser Urbanite On Ear (2014), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:

The Denon AH-MM400 (2016) was loved by reviewers at Wirecutter (NYTimes), a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Everyday Audiophile Headphones" roundup where it was named its "Top Pick", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

Moving on to the Sennheiser Urbanite On Ear (2014): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like PCmag, SoundGuys, TrustedReviews, Expert Reviews, What Hi-Fi?, and Head-fi, enough for them to include them on those lists.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Denon AH-MM400 (2016) and Sennheiser Urbanite On Ear (2014) managed averages of 8.7 and 8.2 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Denon AH-MM400 (2016) vs. Sennheiser Urbanite On Ear (2014) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.