Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Denon AH-MM400 (2016) vs Shure SRH145 (2015)
The Denon AH-MM400 (2016) and Shure SRH145m+ (2015) make for good, if unremarkable, On-Ear Headphones at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $340 and $40 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the Denon AH-MM400 (2016) and the Shure SRH145m+ (2015), however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The Denon AH-MM400 (2016) was loved by reviewers at Wirecutter (NYTimes), a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Everyday Audiophile Headphones" roundup where it was named its "Top Pick", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the Shure SRH145m+ (2015), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - PCmag and CNET - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these On-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Denon AH-MM400 (2016) got its highest, 9.7, rating from Head-fi, while the Shure SRH145m+ (2015) earned its best, 8, score from PCmag.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Denon AH-MM400 (2016) and Shure SRH145m+ (2015) managed averages of 8.7 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Denon AH-MM400 (2016) vs. Shure SRH145m+ (2015) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.