Eureka Groove (NER300) vs Dyson 360 Eye

The Eureka Groove (NER300) and Dyson 360 Eye make for good, if unremarkable, Robot Vacuums at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $150 and $1,000 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Eureka Groove (NER300) and the Dyson 360 Eye, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

The Eureka Groove (NER300) managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Reviewed and Wirecutter (NYTimes) - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

Moving on to the Dyson 360 Eye: it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Expert Reviews, Techradar, CNET, slashgear.com, PCmag, and inews.co.uk, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We also wanted to do a direct Eureka Groove (NER300) vs. Dyson 360 Eye review performance comparison, but we, unfortunately, weren't able to find any Eureka Groove (NER300) review scores.

Finally, we compared the Dyson 360 Eye to other Robot Vacuums on the market and found that it did much better than its competitors - its review average of 7.8 out of 10 points is considerably higher than the 7.2 review average of Robot Vacuums in general.