Dyson 360 Eye vs iRobot Roomba 671

The Dyson 360 Eye is a relatively good Robot Vacuum for people that are willing to spend around $1,000. The iRobot Roomba 671, by contrast, is quite unremarkable and doesn't stand out in any meaningful way from other products at this price point.

In both cases, however, we recommend that you take look at some other options at the $1,000 and $240 budget ranges; in all likelihood you'll find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Dyson 360 Eye and iRobot Roomba 671, however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:

While the Dyson 360 Eye wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Expert Reviews, Techradar, CNET, slashgear.com, PCmag, and inews.co.uk have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the iRobot Roomba 671 - Modern Castle, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Roomba 671 Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Robot Vacuums, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Dyson 360 Eye got its highest, 10, rating from Pocket-lint, while the iRobot Roomba 671 earned its best, 9.4, score from Modern Castle.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Robot Vacuums on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Robot Vacuums being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Dyson 360 Eye and iRobot Roomba 671 managed averages of 7.8 and 9.4 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Dyson 360 Eye vs. iRobot Roomba 671 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.