Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Roborock E4 vs Dyson 360 Eye
The Roborock E4 is a great Robot Vacuum for its $269 asking price.
The Dyson 360 Eye, however, while a reasonable product for $1699, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Robot Vacuums in the $1,700 range, you might want to check out some better options.
The Roborock E4 was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 4 Best Robot Vacuums For Carpet - Winter 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best Budget Robot Vacuum For Carpet", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Moving on to the Dyson 360 Eye: it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Expert Reviews, Techradar, CNET, PCmag, slashgear.com, and inews.co.uk, enough for them to include them on those lists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Robot Vacuums, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Roborock E4 got its highest, 9.6, rating from Modern Castle, while the Dyson 360 Eye earned its best, 10, score from Pocket-lint.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Robot Vacuums on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Robot Vacuums being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Roborock E4 and Dyson 360 Eye managed averages of 9.6 and 7.8 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Roborock E4 vs. Dyson 360 Eye comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing