Dyson 360 Eye vs Roborock S6 Pure

The Dyson 360 Eye and Roborock S6 Pure make for good, if unremarkable, Robot Vacuums at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $1,700 and $460 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Dyson 360 Eye and the Roborock S6 Pure, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

While the Dyson 360 Eye wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Expert Reviews, Techradar, CNET, PCmag, slashgear.com, and inews.co.uk have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Roborock S6 Pure - it impressed reviewers at Android Central, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Keep your floors clean and save BIG with one of the best robot vacuums" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Best battery life" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Robot Vacuums, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Dyson 360 Eye got its highest, 10, rating from Pocket-lint, while the Roborock S6 Pure earned its best, 9, score from The Ambient.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Robot Vacuums on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Robot Vacuums being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Dyson 360 Eye and Roborock S6 Pure managed averages of 7.8 and 9.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Dyson 360 Eye vs. Roborock S6 Pure comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.