EarFun Air vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 (2020)

We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options in the $65 and $220 budget ranges instead.

The EarFun Air has managed to do great in various roundups conducted by reviewers from highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Tom's Guide, CNET, and PCmag - it was dubbed "The best AirPods alternative" by Tom's Guide, "Good true-wireless earbuds don't have to be expensive" by CNET, and "Ranked 3 out of 13" by PCmag. Any product that's held in such high regard by some of the most reliable sources should be considered by everyone who's looking for a Wireless Earphone at this price.

Taking a look at the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 3.0, it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Rtings and TrustedReviews - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Wireless Earphones, including TrustedReviews, preferred the EarFun Air over the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 3.0.

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The EarFun Air was liked best by What Hi-Fi?, which gave it a score of 10, while the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 3.0 got its highest, 8, score from TrustedReviews.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wireless Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wireless Earphones being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the EarFun Air and Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 3.0 managed averages of 8.6 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct EarFun Air vs. Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 3.0 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.