Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
Loading
Etymotic ER4XR
KZ ATE (2015)
See Top Ranked Earphones

Etymotic ER4 (2016) vs KZ ATE (2015)

Analysis:

The Etymotic ER4XR is a relatively good Earphone for people that are willing to spend around $280. The KZ ATE (2015), by contrast, is quite unremarkable and doesn't stand out in any meaningful way from other products at this price point.

In both cases, however, we recommend that you take look at some other options at the $280 and $11 budget ranges; in all likelihood you'll find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Etymotic ER4XR and KZ ATE (2015), however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:

The Etymotic ER4XR was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Studio Headphones for 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Budget-Minded Sound Engineers", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the KZ ATE (2015) - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ ATE In-Ear Monitors review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Earphones, including Head-fi, preferred the Etymotic ER4XR over the KZ ATE (2015).

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Etymotic ER4XR was liked best by PCmag, which gave it a score of 10, while the KZ ATE (2015) got its highest, 9, score from WIRED.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Etymotic ER4XR and KZ ATE (2015) managed averages of 8.5 and 8.6 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Etymotic ER4XR vs. KZ ATE (2015) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.

Comparison of expert ratings
Highly Recommended
Recommended
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
PCmag
HomeTheaterReview.com
Rtings
Head-fi
TechHive
Digitaltrends
What Hi-Fi?
Reddit
WIRED
Tech. Specs Comparison
Etymotic ER4XR
$299
KZ ATE (2015)
$13
Canal Earphone
Yes
Yes
Earbud
No
No
In-Ear Monitor
No
Yes
Noise-cancelling
No
No
True Wireless
No
No
Wireless
No
No
Higher than average expert review score
Higher than average expert review score
7.4
Overall Avg. for Earphones
8.6
Avg. Review Score
Score
Recommended by trusted experts
PCmag
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best Overall
in “The Best Wired Headphones for 2020” 
Last updated: 20 days ago
PCmag
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best Overall
in “The Best Audiophile Headphones for 2020” 
Last updated: 15 Apr 2020
PCmag
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best Overall
in “The Best Studio Headphones for 2020” 
Last updated: 15 Apr 2020
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The 7 Best Studio Headphones For Mixing And Recording - Summer 2020” 
Last updated: 21 days ago
Recommendations
No Data

Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
undefinedurl nextprice drop