Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Fitbit Ionic 2017 vs Fitbit Alta 2016
While the Fitbit Ionic 2017 makes for a fairly good Smart Watch for people with a $160 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Fitbit Alta 2016 to come to any reliable conclusions.
In either case, we suggest that you look at some other options at the $160 and $25 budget ranges before committing to one of these.
If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the Fitbit Ionic 2017 and Fitbit Alta 2016, however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:
The Fitbit Ionic 2017 was loved by reviewers at Tom's Guide, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best Fitbit in 2020: Choose the right fitness tracker" roundup where it was named its "Best Fitbit with GPS", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Fitbit Alta 2016 - it impressed reviewers at Expert Reviews, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best Fitbit 2021: Which Fitbit tracker is right for you?" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Most stylish Fitbit" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
Out of the sources that tested and rated both of these Smart Watches, PCmag and Runnerclick preferred the Fitbit Ionic 2017, whereas reviewers at Macworld, Expert Reviews, CNET, and TrustedReviews liked the Fitbit Alta 2016 better. TechGearLab, Pocket-lint, and Techradar gave them identical review scores.
We also took a look at which sources liked these products best - the highest Fitbit Ionic 2017 rating came from Windows Central, whereas the Fitbit Alta 2016 most impressed reviewers at Macworld; they earned scores of 9 and 9, respectively.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Smart Watches on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Smart Watches being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Fitbit Ionic 2017 and Fitbit Alta 2016 managed averages of 7.5 and 7.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Fitbit Ionic 2017 vs. Fitbit Alta 2016 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing