Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Focal Elear vs AKG K92 (2016)
The Focal Elear makes for a mediocre Open-Back Headphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.
In the case of the AKG K92 (2016), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.
If you're still interested in reading more about the Focal Elear, however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:
While the Focal Elear wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Headphone Review, The Verge, Head-fi, Headfonics, iMore, Rtings, and Audioholics have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.
As for the AKG K92 (2016), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and Techradar enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Head-fi, and learned that they all showed a preference for the AKG K92 (2016).
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Open-Back Headphones received. We found that the Focal Elear managed to earn a rating of 9 from Headphone Review, whereas the AKG K92 (2016) got its highest, 10, score from reviewers at What Hi-Fi?.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The AKG K92 (2016) managed to get 8.2 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.8 review average of Open-Back Headphones in general - whereas the Focal Elear earned 7.8 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Focal Elear vs. AKG K92 (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.