Olympus OM-D E-M1 Cameras (2016) vs Fujifilm GFX Cameras (2017)

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016) has impressed reviewers from two sources that are among the most highly trusted on the internet, namely Digital Photography Review and The Phoblographer. It did great in their objective hands-on roundups - it earned the "Ranked 2 out of 4" and "Ranked 2 out of 10" awards from Digital Photography Review and The Phoblographer, respectively. That's high praise from such reputable sources.

Returning to the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017), The Phoblographer, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Ranked 3 out of 20" in its "18 Cameras We’ve Reviewed and Loved That Easily Double as Webcams" roundup, which is quite a feat.

Out of the sources that tested and rated both of these Mirrorless Cameras, Techradar and Digital Camera World preferred the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016), whereas reviewers at ePHOTOzine liked the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) better. Photography Blog, TrustedReviews, and PCmag gave them identical review scores.

We also took a look at which sources liked these products best - the highest Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016) rating came from Techradar, whereas the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) most impressed reviewers at ePHOTOzine; they earned scores of 10 and 10, respectively.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Mirrorless Cameras on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Mirrorless Cameras being 7.9 out of 10, whereas the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016) and Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) managed averages of 8.9 and 8.9 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016) vs. Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.