Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Fujifilm GFX Cameras (2017) vs Olympus Pen E-PL Cameras (2018)
The Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) was loved by reviewers at The Phoblographer, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "18 Cameras We’ve Reviewed and Loved That Easily Double as Webcams" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 3 out of 20", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Moving on to the Olympus Pen E-PL9 (2018): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like ePHOTOzine, Techradar, Photography Blog, Expert Reviews, camerajabber.com, Tom's Guide, and PCmag, enough for them to include them on those lists.
Our direct Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) vs. Olympus Pen E-PL9 (2018) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Mirrorless Cameras, ePHOTOzine, camerajabber.com, Photography Blog, and PCmag preferred the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017), whereas Techradar and Digitaltrends seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) got its highest, 10, review score from ePHOTOzine, while the Olympus Pen E-PL9 (2018) most impressed reviewers at ePHOTOzine, which gave it a score of 9.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Fujifilm GFX 50S (2017) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.9 out of 10, compared to the 7.9 overall average of Mirrorless Cameras in general, whereas the Olympus Pen E-PL9 (2018) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.9.
- 1920 × 1080 @ 30fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 24fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 25fps
- 1280 x 720 @ 120fps
- 1920 × 1080 @ 30fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 24fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 25fps
- 3840 x 2160 @ 24fps
- 3840 x 2160 @ 25fps
- 3840 x 2160 @ 30fps
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing