Mavix M9 vs Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair

The Mavix M9 is an example of a great Office Chair at its $1,100 budget.

In the case of the $99 Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair, however, we weren't able to find enough data to come to any reliable conclusions. If you're considering buying a Office Chair in the $110 range, we encourage you to take a look at some other options.

The Mavix M9 has managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and objective sources that conduct their own testing, namely PCGamesN and Techradar. It did great in their roundups - it earned the "best ergonomic gaming chair" title from PCGamesN, and "Made for gaming, great for the office" from Techradar, which marks it as a product that's worth considering.

As for the Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair, it was really well-received by reviewers at Wirecutter, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The Best Cheap Gaming Chair for Your Living Room" roundup and was named its "Ranked 1 out of 5", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Office Chairs, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Mavix M9 got its highest, 10, rating from T3, while the Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair earned its best, 7.2, score from GamingScan.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Office Chairs on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Office Chairs being 6.9 out of 10, whereas the Mavix M9 and Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair managed averages of 8.9 and 7.2 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Mavix M9 vs. Homall S-Racer Gaming Chair comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.