Brother MFC-J985 (2016) vs HP OfficeJet Pro 8025

The Brother MFC-J985DW and HP OfficeJet Pro 8035 make for good, if unremarkable, Home Printers at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $650 and $180 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Brother MFC-J985DW and the HP OfficeJet Pro 8035, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

The reviewers at PCmag have featured the Brother MFC-J985DW in their Brother MFC-J985DW Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the HP OfficeJet Pro 8035 analysis - it impressed reviewers at Reviewed, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "The Best Printers of 2021" roundup and earned the "Top Pick" title.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Home Printers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Brother MFC-J985DW got its highest, 8.8, rating from Lifewire, while the HP OfficeJet Pro 8035 earned its best, 8.6, score from Gadget Review.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Home Printers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Home Printers being 7.1 out of 10, whereas the Brother MFC-J985DW and HP OfficeJet Pro 8035 managed averages of 8.2 and 8.6 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Brother MFC-J985DW vs. HP OfficeJet Pro 8035 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.