Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
HP VH240a (2017) vs Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ 2017
The HP VH240a is a great Monitor for its $222 asking price.
The Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ, however, while a reasonable product for $1399, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Monitors in the $1,500 range, you might want to check out some better options.
technoburst.com, a review site with a history of doing objective hands-on testing, has great things to say about the HP VH240a. In fact, it's "Ranked 1 out of 4" in its "Best Monitors For GTX 1070 & GTX 1070 Ti" roundup, which points toward it being a good Monitor.
As for the Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ analysis - it impressed reviewers at technoburst.com, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best 144Hz Curved Gaming Monitor (2023 Updated)" roundup and earned the "Best Image Quality" title.
We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Monitors. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - MonitorNerds favored the Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ over the HP VH240a, whereas reviewers at PCmag haven't shown a preference for either.
Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the HP VH240a was best received by MonitorNerds - it gave it a score of 9, whereas the Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ got its highest score of 9.4 from reviewers at MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the HP VH240a and Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ managed averages of 8.5 and 8.5 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct HP VH240a vs. Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing