Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Hydro Flask Standard Mouth Water Bottle vs Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series
Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series
The Hydro Flask Standard Mouth Water Bottle (21 Oz) has managed to impress reviewers from some of the most highly trusted sources on the internet, including Wirecutter and Your Best Digs. It performed great in their in-depth hands-on roundups - it was awarded the "Other good kids water bottles" title by Wirecutter and "Design Winner" by divein.com in their respective Regular Water Bottle roundups. That's high praise, especially when coming from such high-quality sources.
As for the Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at OutdoorGearLab, Switchback Travel, and Gear Patrol enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
As for a direct Hydro Flask Standard Mouth Water Bottle (21 Oz) vs. Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like OutdoorGearLab. It turns out that all such sources consider the Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Hydro Flask Standard Mouth Water Bottle (21 Oz) most impressed reviewers at divein.com - they gave it a score of 9.6, whereas the Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series got rated best by OutdoorGearLab - 10.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Hydro Flask Standard Mouth Water Bottle (21 Oz) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.3 out of 10, compared to the 6.4 overall average of Regular Water Bottles in general, whereas the Hydro Flask Lightweight Wide Mouth Trail Series hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 10.0.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing