Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Razer Basilisk (2017) vs HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018)
HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018)
The Razer Basilisk (2017) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Gaming Mouse for people with a $50 budget.
The HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018), however, is merely mediocre at its $39 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $50 and $35 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Razer Basilisk (2017) and HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
While the Razer Basilisk (2017) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Windows Central, TechSpot, PCmag, hardwarezone.com.sg, PC Gamer, PCWorld, Tom's Guide, and CNET have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.
Taking a look at the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Tom's Guide and Windows Central - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Mice on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Mice being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the Razer Basilisk (2017) and HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018) managed averages of 8.7 and 9.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Razer Basilisk (2017) vs. HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (2018) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.