Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
iRobot Roomba i3 vs Roborock S6 MaxV
The iRobot Roomba i3 (3150) impressed reviewers from numerous sources that do high-quality in-depth testing, such as Rtings, Wirecutter, Consumer Reports, Pro Tool Reviews, and Tom's Guide. It performed amazingly well in their roundups - it was dubbed "Best Mid-Range iRobot Vacuum" by Rtings, "Excellent cleaner, smart enough" by Wirecutter, and "Ranked 2 out of 5" by Consumer Reports. That, by itself, suggests that it's an excellent product.
As for the Roborock S6 MaxV - it impressed reviewers from a large number of trusted sources that are known for their reliable hands-on testing, including livingetc.com, reviewgeek.com, Android Central, Popular Mechanics, techadvisor.com, MakeUseOf, and The Ambient. It performed great in their respective roundups - it got named "Best robot vacuum cleaner" by livingetc.com, "A Roomba Alternative" by reviewgeek.com, and "Best for object detection" by Android Central. Such endorsement from trusted sources marks it as a product that's worthy of consideration.
For a direct iRobot Roomba i3 (3150) vs. Roborock S6 MaxV comparison, we took a look at sources that tested both and found that the iRobot Roomba i3 (3150) got reviewed better by Modern Castle, The Ambient, Digitaltrends, Tom's Guide, and PCmag, whereas the reviewers at Rtings preferred the Roborock S6 MaxV. Reviewers at bestcordlessvacuumguide.com haven't shown a preference for either.
We also took a look at which sources liked these two products the most. We found that the iRobot Roomba i3 (3150) received its best, 10, rating from Expert Reviews, while the Roborock S6 MaxV got its highest score of 9.5 from Modern Castle.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the iRobot Roomba i3 (3150) earned an average review score of 8.5 out of 10 points and the Roborock S6 MaxV received an average of 8.0, compared to the 7.2 average of Robot Vacuums in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing