CCA C12 vs Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016)

While the CCA C12 is a passable option for $48, you might want to look into some other options at its price point - chances are, there are some better alternatives available on the market.

As for the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016), we, unfortunately, weren't able to find enough data to draw any meaningful conclusions.

If you are still interested in finding out more about the CCA C12, however, here's what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C12 in their CCA C12 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Moving on to the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like SoundGuys, Head-fi, CNET, Rtings, Techradar, and 9to5Google, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We also performed a thorough CCA C12 vs. Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the CCA C12 over the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the CCA C12 turned out to be most loved by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 8.7, whereas the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at SoundGuys.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the CCA C12 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.7 out of 10, compared to the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general, whereas the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.6.