Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) vs Tennmak Pro

The Tennmak Pro is a mediocre In-Ear Monitor at best and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016), however, we couldn't find enough data to draw any meaningful conclusions. We strongly suggest that you take a look at some better In-Ear Monitors in the $25 budget range instead.

If you're nevertheless intent on reading more about the Tennmak Pro, however, here's what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the Tennmak Pro in their Tennmak Pro Dual Dynamic Driver Professional In-Ear Sport Detach Earphone Headphones with Microphone & Remote(black) roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Moving on to the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like SoundGuys, Head-fi, CNET, Rtings, and Techradar, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We also performed a thorough Tennmak Pro vs. Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the Tennmak Pro over the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Tennmak Pro turned out to be most loved by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 9.4, whereas the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at SoundGuys.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Tennmak Pro did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.4 out of 10, compared to the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general, whereas the Jaybird Freedom F5 (2016) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.6.