Jaybird X4 (2018) vs CCA C10

The CCA C10 makes for a mediocre In-Ear Monitor and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Jaybird X4 (2018), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $55 and $85 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the CCA C10, however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Returning to the Jaybird X4 (2018), SoundGuys, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best workout" in its "Best alternatives to Beats" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the CCA C10 got its highest, 9.1, rating from Head-fi, while the Jaybird X4 (2018) earned its best, 9, score from Macworld.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other In-Ear Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by In-Ear Monitors being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the CCA C10 and Jaybird X4 (2018) managed averages of 9.1 and 8.3 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct CCA C10 vs. Jaybird X4 (2018) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.