Jaybird X4 (2018) vs Final Audio Design E3000 (2017)

The Final Audio Design E3000 (2017) makes for a mediocre Earphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Jaybird X4 (2018), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $40 and $60 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the Final Audio Design E3000 (2017), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the Final Audio Design E3000 (2017) in their Final Audio Design E3000 review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Jaybird X4 (2018), it was really well-received by reviewers at SoundGuys, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best alternatives to Beats" roundup and was named its "Best workout", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Final Audio Design E3000 (2017) got its highest, 8.8, rating from Head-fi, while the Jaybird X4 (2018) earned its best, 9, score from TrustedReviews.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Final Audio Design E3000 (2017) and Jaybird X4 (2018) managed averages of 8.8 and 8.4 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Final Audio Design E3000 (2017) vs. Jaybird X4 (2018) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.