Jaybird X4 (2018) vs Klipsch Reference x6i

The Jaybird X4 (2018) makes for an outstanding Earphone at $91. The Klipsch Reference x6i, however, while overall a good product for its asking price, doesn't quite manage to stand out from its competition - there are better Earphones that can be found for around $160 available here.

The Jaybird X4 (2018) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Wireless Headphones for 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Workout-Focused Audiophiles", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Klipsch Reference x6i, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Techradar, PCmag, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Earphones. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - Techradar favored the Klipsch Reference x6i over the Jaybird X4 (2018), whereas reviewers at PCmag haven't shown a preference for either.

Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the Jaybird X4 (2018) was best received by TrustedReviews - it gave it a score of 9, whereas the Klipsch Reference x6i got its highest score of 9 from reviewers at Techradar.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Jaybird X4 (2018) and Klipsch Reference x6i managed averages of 8.2 and 8.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Jaybird X4 (2018) vs. Klipsch Reference x6i comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.