Jaybird X4 (2018) vs KZ ATE (2015)

The Jaybird X4 (2018) has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform their own hands-on testing, such as Android Central, Gear Patrol, and iMore - it was awarded the "Jaybird dominates the workout earbuds market, and for good reason. Its latest offering in this space, the X4, features an IPX7 waterproof design, Comply foam ear tips that provide a secure fit, custom EQ profiles to tailor the sound to your preferences, and eight hours of play time between charges." title by Android Central, "Ranked 1 out of 10" by Gear Patrol, and "Ranked 1 out of 7" by iMore. That's high praise from reliable sources.

Taking a look at the KZ ATE (2015), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Head-fi and headphonesaddict.com - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.

We also performed a thorough Jaybird X4 (2018) vs. KZ ATE (2015) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Wireless Earphones, including headphonesaddict.com, preferred the Jaybird X4 (2018) over the KZ ATE (2015).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Jaybird X4 (2018) turned out to be most loved by Macworld, which gave it a score of 9, whereas the KZ ATE (2015) got its highest, 8.2, rating from reviewers at Head-fi.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Jaybird X4 (2018) earned an average review score of 8.1 out of 10 points and the KZ ATE (2015) received an average of 7.4, compared to the 7.2 average of Wireless Earphones in general.