Jaybird X4 (2018) vs KZ ZS6 (2017)

The KZ ZS6 (2017) makes for a mediocre Canal Earphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Jaybird X4 (2018), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $40 and $60 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the KZ ZS6 (2017), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

No sources that do their own in-depth testing have considered the KZ ZS6 (2017) to be a good enough purchase for it to earn a sport in their Canal Earphone roundups, which is typically a bad sign.

Returning to the Jaybird X4 (2018), SoundGuys, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best workout" in its "Best alternatives to Beats" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We also wanted to do a direct KZ ZS6 (2017) vs. Jaybird X4 (2018) review performance comparison, but we, unfortunately, weren't able to find any KZ ZS6 (2017) review scores.

Finally, we compared the Jaybird X4 (2018) to other Canal Earphones on the market and found that it did much better than its competitors - its review average of 8.4 out of 10 points is considerably higher than the 7.4 review average of Canal Earphones in general.