Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Jaybird X4 (2018) vs Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015)
Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015)
The Jaybird X4 (2018) has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform their own hands-on testing, such as Android Central, Gear Patrol, and iMore - it was awarded the "Jaybird dominates the workout earbuds market, and for good reason. Its latest offering in this space, the X4, features an IPX7 waterproof design, Comply foam ear tips that provide a secure fit, custom EQ profiles to tailor the sound to your preferences, and eight hours of play time between charges." title by Android Central, "Ranked 1 out of 10" by Gear Patrol, and "Ranked 1 out of 7" by iMore. That's high praise from reliable sources.
Moving on to the Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Head-fi, CNET, Expert Reviews, Rtings, and TrustedReviews, enough for them to include them on those lists.
We also performed a thorough Jaybird X4 (2018) vs. Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Wireless Earphones, including TrustedReviews and Rtings, preferred the Jaybird X4 (2018) over the Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015).
Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Jaybird X4 (2018) turned out to be most loved by Macworld, which gave it a score of 9, whereas the Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015) got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at Head-fi.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Jaybird X4 (2018) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.1 out of 10, compared to the 7.2 overall average of Wireless Earphones in general, whereas the Mee Audio Sport-Fi M6 (2015) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 6.9.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing