Jaybird X4 (2018) vs Shure SE425 (2010)

We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options in the $60 and $270 budget ranges instead.

The Jaybird X4 (2018) was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best alternatives to Beats" roundup where it was named its "Best workout", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Shure SE425 (2010) - it impressed reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "The best headphones of 2021" roundup - in fact, it earned its "An excellent pair of no-compromise in-ear headphones." title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like TrustedReviews, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two Wireless Earphones best and found that the Jaybird X4 (2018) got its highest, 9, review score from reviewers at TrustedReviews, whereas the Shure SE425 (2010) earned its best score of 10 from What Hi-Fi?.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wireless Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wireless Earphones being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Jaybird X4 (2018) and Shure SE425 (2010) managed averages of 8.4 and 9.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Jaybird X4 (2018) vs. Shure SE425 (2010) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.