Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Jaybird X4 (2018) vs Sony WF-SP700N
The Jaybird X4 (2018) has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform their own hands-on testing, such as Android Central, Gear Patrol, and iMore - it was awarded the "Jaybird dominates the workout earbuds market, and for good reason. Its latest offering in this space, the X4, features an IPX7 waterproof design, Comply foam ear tips that provide a secure fit, custom EQ profiles to tailor the sound to your preferences, and eight hours of play time between charges." title by Android Central, "Ranked 1 out of 10" by Gear Patrol, and "Ranked 1 out of 7" by iMore. That's high praise from reliable sources.
Moving on to the Sony WF-SP700N: it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Head-fi, CNET, SoundGuys, Techradar, Rtings, PCmag, Consumer Reports, realgear.net, and 9to5Google, enough for them to include them on those lists.
We also performed a thorough Jaybird X4 (2018) vs. Sony WF-SP700N review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Noise-Cancelling Earphones, including SoundGuys, PCmag, Techradar, and Rtings, preferred the Jaybird X4 (2018) over the Sony WF-SP700N.
Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Jaybird X4 (2018) turned out to be most loved by Macworld, which gave it a score of 9, whereas the Sony WF-SP700N got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at musicphotolife.com.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Jaybird X4 (2018) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.1 out of 10, compared to the 7.3 overall average of Noise-Cancelling Earphones in general, whereas the Sony WF-SP700N hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 6.8.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing