CCA C10 vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)

While the CCA C10 is a passable option for its $40 asking price, you might want to look into other options at its price point - chances are, there are better choices out there.

As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), we, unfortunately, couldn't find enough data on the product to come to any meaningful conclusions.

If you're nevertheless interested in learning more about the CCA C10, however, you can read on for a summary on what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and TrustedReviews enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the CCA C10 over the Jays a-Jays Five (2013).

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The CCA C10 was liked best by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 9.1, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) got its highest, 7, score from Digitaltrends.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to their competition, we averaged out their review scores and found that the CCA C10 got received considerably better than the majority of other In-Ear Monitors - it earned an average of 9.1 out of 10 points, compared to the 7.7 overall rating of other In-Ear Monitors - while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) performed worse than most of its competitors, with its average review score of 6.3.

It's worth keeping in mind, however, that a direct CCA C10 vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison might not be realistic since they're priced differently and some sources have a tendency to review more expensive products better than cheaper ones.