Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Klipsch R6 II (2017) vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
While the Klipsch R6 II (2017) makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $30 or $50.
However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Klipsch R6 II (2017) and the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:
The reviewers at What Hi-Fi? have featured the Klipsch R6 II (2017) in their Klipsch R6i II review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Head-fi, What Hi-Fi?, TrustedReviews, and Gear Patrol enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Earphones, including What Hi-Fi?, preferred the Klipsch R6 II (2017) over the Jays a-Jays Five (2013).
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Klipsch R6 II (2017) was liked best by What Hi-Fi?, which gave it a score of 10, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) got its highest, 7, score from Digitaltrends.
Finally, we compared them to other Earphones on the market and found that the two of them got reviewed similarly to the majority of their competitors. The overall average review score for Earphones in general is 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Klipsch R6 II (2017) and Jays a-Jays Five (2013) managed averages of 10.0 and 6.5 points, respectively.
It should be noted that it might not be entirely fair to do a direct Klipsch R6 II (2017) vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison due to the difference in their pricing; some sources have a tendency to review more premium products better than more affordable ones.