Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
KZ ATE (2015) vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
While the KZ ATE (2015) makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $14 or $50.
However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the KZ ATE (2015) and the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:
The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the KZ ATE (2015) in their KZ ATE In-Ear Monitors review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Head-fi, TrustedReviews, What Hi-Fi?, and Gear Patrol enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Earphones, including Head-fi, preferred the KZ ATE (2015) over the Jays a-Jays Five (2013).
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The KZ ATE (2015) was liked best by WIRED, which gave it a score of 9, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) got its highest, 7, score from Digitaltrends.
Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the KZ ATE (2015), with its 8.6 average, performed considerably better than most Earphones - the mean score for the product category being 7.3 out of 10 - while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) managed an average of 6.5.
There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct KZ ATE (2015) vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.