Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Shure SE215 vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
While the Shure SE215 makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $95 or $40.
However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Shure SE215 and the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:
The Shure SE215 was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best headphones for ASMR" roundup where it was named its "Best In-Ears", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Head-fi, TrustedReviews, What Hi-Fi?, and Gear Patrol enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Shure SE215 got its highest, 6.1, rating from Rtings, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) earned its best, 7, score from Digitaltrends.
Finally, we analyzed all of their review data and compared their averages to other options on the market. With an average review rating of 6.5 out of 10 points, the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) performed similarly to most of its competitors - the overall average review score for Earphones being 7.3 - whereas the Shure SE215 performed worse than most, with its 6.1 average.
It's worth keeping in mind that a direct Shure SE215 vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison might not be entirely fair because some sources tend to ignore value for money when assigning their scores and thus often give better reviews to more expensive products.