Shure SE535 vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)

The Shure SE535 makes for a mediocre In-Ear Monitor and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

It's very likely that you can find some considerably better alternatives on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the Shure SE535, however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

While the Shure SE535 wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. The Verge, Techradar, TrustedReviews, headphonesaddict.com, Head-fi, and inews.co.uk have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and TrustedReviews enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both In-Ear Monitors, including TrustedReviews and Head-fi, preferred the Shure SE535 over the Jays a-Jays Five (2013).

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Shure SE535 was liked best by The Verge, which gave it a score of 9.4, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) got its highest, 7, score from Digitaltrends.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to their competition, we averaged out their review scores and found that the Shure SE535 got received considerably better than the majority of other In-Ear Monitors - it earned an average of 8.7 out of 10 points, compared to the 7.7 overall rating of other In-Ear Monitors - while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) performed worse than most of its competitors, with its average review score of 6.3.

It's worth keeping in mind, however, that a direct Shure SE535 vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison might not be realistic since they're priced differently and some sources have a tendency to review more expensive products better than cheaper ones.