Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Sony WI-C600N vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
While the Sony WI-C600N makes for a passable Canal Earphone for its asking price, the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $150 or $45.
However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Sony WI-C600N and the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:
The reviewers at Rtings have featured the Sony WI-C600N in their Sony WI-C600N Wireless Headphones Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Head-fi, TrustedReviews, What Hi-Fi?, and Gear Patrol enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Sony WI-C600N got its highest, 7, rating from Rtings, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) earned its best, 7, score from Digitaltrends.
Finally, we compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market and found that the two of them got reviewed similarly to the majority of their competitors. The overall average review score for Canal Earphones in general is 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Sony WI-C600N and Jays a-Jays Five (2013) managed averages of 7.0 and 6.5 points, respectively.
It should be noted that it might not be entirely fair to do a direct Sony WI-C600N vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison due to the difference in their pricing; some sources have a tendency to review more premium products better than more affordable ones.