Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Sony WI-SP600N vs Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
Jays a-Jays Five (2013)
The Sony WI-SP600N makes for a mediocre Earphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.
In the case of the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.
It's very likely that you can find some considerably better alternatives on the market.
If you're still interested in reading more about the Sony WI-SP600N, however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:
The Sony WI-SP600N managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Rtings and Techradar - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.
As for the Jays a-Jays Five (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and TrustedReviews enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Sony WI-SP600N got its highest, 6.9, rating from Rtings, while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) earned its best, 7, score from Digitaltrends.
Lastly, we compared their average review performance to that of the rest of their competition and found that neither option got received particularly well. With an average rating of 6.5 out of 10, the Sony WI-SP600N performed similarly to most other Earphones on the market - the overall average review score for this product category being 7.3 - while the Jays a-Jays Five (2013) did worse than most, with its average of 6.3 points.
There's one caveat here - a direct Sony WI-SP600N vs. Jays a-Jays Five (2013) comparison might not be entirely justifiable due to the difference in their pricing and the fact that some sources tend to give lower ratings to cheaper products because they don't take value for money into account.