Skullcandy Ink'd Wireless (2016) vs JBL LIVE 100

The Skullcandy Ink'd Wireless (2016) was well-received by reviewers at Good Housekeeping, a trustworthy source that performs unbiased hands-on testing. It did great in their "We Listened for 500 Hours to Find the Best In-Ear Headphones" roundup - they named it their "Ranked 3 out of 8", which, by itself, suggests that it's a noteworthy product.

Taking a look at the JBL LIVE 100, we found that it hasn't managed to perform well enough to earn a spot in any In-Ear Monitor roundups done by sources that conduct their own, high-quality, hands-on testing. That alone makes it difficult to recommend.

Lastly, we wanted to do a direct Skullcandy Ink'd Wireless (2016) vs. JBL LIVE 100 comparison of their review scores, but couldn't find any ratings for the JBL LIVE 100.

Nevertheless, we were still able to analyze how the Skullcandy Ink'd Wireless (2016) fared when compared to the rest of its competition. Our analysis of its review data has shown that it earned an average review score of 7.7, which is on par with the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general.