Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Sony MDR-XB50AP vs JLab Epic Sport (2018)
The Sony MDR-XB50AP was well-received by reviewers at Android Central, a trustworthy source that performs unbiased hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best Beat Saber Accessories 2022" roundup - they named it their "Like most Sony headphones, the names of these earbuds are completely unintelligible and unmemorable. Thankfully, the experience you get from it is the complete opposite, as these earbuds deliver significantly more bass than you're probably used to if you've ever used a pair of cheapy pack-in earbuds before. Several silicone tip sizes are included to fit all sorts of ears, and the 3.5mm plug on the end fits perfectly into the port on the Quest 2. As a bonus, they also come in Beat Saber red or blue colors to match the mood.", which, by itself, suggests that it's a noteworthy product.
As for the JLab Epic Sport (2018) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Gear Patrol, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "What’s In the Office This Week: The Tech We’re Testing Right Now" roundup and earned the "Ranked 3 out of 3" title.
We tried doing a direct Sony MDR-XB50AP vs. JLab Epic Sport (2018) review score comparison but couldn't find any sources that tested both.
Next, we took a look at which sources liked them best and found that the Sony MDR-XB50AP most impressed the reviewers at headphonesaddict.com, who gave it a score of 6.8, whereas the JLab Epic Sport (2018) did best in its Headphone Review review - it scored 8.4 points.
Finally, we compared them to other Wireless Earphones and found that the JLab Epic Sport (2018), on average, got reviewed considerably better than most of its competitors - it earned a review average of 7.9 points, compared to the 7.2 out of 10 overall rating of Wireless Earphones in general, whereas the Sony MDR-XB50AP performed worse than the majority of its competitors, with an average of only 6.2.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing