Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 vs JLab Jbuds Air Executive
Both options make for good, if unremarkable, Earphones at the $75 budget range. While they should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into some other options at that price point.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 and JLab Jbuds Air Executive, however, we wrote-up what we know about them:
The Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best wireless neckband earbuds" roundup where it was named its "Best all-around", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the JLab Jbuds Air Executive - it was really well-received by reviewers at Rtings, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The 5 Best AirPods Clones - Winter 2021" roundup and was named its "Runner Up for Best AirPods Clone For Neutral Sound - Alternative For Fans Of Bass", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
Our direct Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 vs. JLab Jbuds Air Executive comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Earphones, SoundGuys and PCmag preferred the Plantronics BackBeat Go 410, whereas Techradar seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 got its highest, 8, review score from Techradar, while the JLab Jbuds Air Executive most impressed reviewers at Techradar, which gave it a score of 8.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Plantronics BackBeat Go 410 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 7.4 out of 10, compared to the 7.3 overall average of Earphones in general, whereas the JLab Jbuds Air Executive hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.0.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing