Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Samsung Galaxy Buds (2019) vs JLab Jbuds Air Executive
The Samsung Galaxy Buds is widely considered to be a great Earphone at its $85 budget. The JLab Jbuds Air Executive, however, while also a good product at this price point, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well.
The Samsung Galaxy Buds has impressed reviewers from two sources that are among the most highly trusted on the internet, namely CNET and Tom's Guide. It did great in their objective hands-on roundups - it earned the "Best value Samsung" and "Best cheap truly wireless earbuds" awards from CNET and Tom's Guide, respectively. That's high praise from such reputable sources.
As for the JLab Jbuds Air Executive - it was really well-received by reviewers at Rtings, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The 5 Best AirPods Clones - Winter 2021" roundup and was named its "Runner Up for Best AirPods Clone For Neutral Sound - Alternative For Fans Of Bass", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
Our direct Samsung Galaxy Buds vs. JLab Jbuds Air Executive comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Earphones, PCmag, SoundGuys, Android Authority, and Rtings preferred the Samsung Galaxy Buds, whereas Techradar seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Samsung Galaxy Buds got its highest, 10, review score from Head-fi, while the JLab Jbuds Air Executive most impressed reviewers at Techradar, which gave it a score of 8.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Samsung Galaxy Buds did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 7.7 out of 10, compared to the 7.3 overall average of Earphones in general, whereas the JLab Jbuds Air Executive hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.0.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing