JLab Jbuds Air Executive vs Sony MDR-XB50AP

The JLab Jbuds Air Executive makes for a good, if unremarkable Canal Earphone for people with a $35 budget. The Sony MDR-XB50AP, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $35 price range - chances are that there are better options available.

If you're still interested in learning more about the JLab Jbuds Air Executive and Sony MDR-XB50AP, however, we put together a summary of what we know:

While the JLab Jbuds Air Executive wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Techradar, Rtings, SoundGuys, Android Authority, PCmag, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Sony MDR-XB50AP analysis - it impressed reviewers at The Verge, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "The best headphones for under $50" roundup and earned the "Ranked 2 out of 12" title.

We also performed a thorough JLab Jbuds Air Executive vs. Sony MDR-XB50AP review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Canal Earphones, including Rtings, preferred the JLab Jbuds Air Executive over the Sony MDR-XB50AP.

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the JLab Jbuds Air Executive turned out to be most loved by Techradar, which gave it a score of 8, whereas the Sony MDR-XB50AP got its highest, 5.9, rating from reviewers at Rtings.

Finally, we compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market and found that neither of them got reviewed particularly well - with an average score of 7.0 out of 10 points, the JLab Jbuds Air Executive got rated similarly to most of its competitors - the overall average review score for Canal Earphones being 7.4 - while the Sony MDR-XB50AP performed even worse than most Canal Earphones, with an average of 5.9.