Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
JVC Flats HAS160 vs AKG K81 DJ (2004)
The JVC Flats HAS160 is a great On-Ear Headphone for its $19 asking price.
The AKG K81 DJ (2004), however, while a reasonable product for $66, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering On-Ear Headphones in the $85 range, you might want to check out some better options.
The JVC Flats HAS160 was loved by reviewers at CNET, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best cheap earbuds and headphones" roundup where it was named its "Best cheap wired on-ear", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the AKG K81 DJ (2004), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - What Hi-Fi? and Head-fi - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these On-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the JVC Flats HAS160 got its highest, 8, rating from CNET, while the AKG K81 DJ (2004) earned its best, 10, score from What Hi-Fi?.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the JVC Flats HAS160 and AKG K81 DJ (2004) managed averages of 8.0 and 9.3 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct JVC Flats HAS160 vs. AKG K81 DJ (2004) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.