Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
Loading
JVC Flats HAS160
Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016)
See Top Ranked On-Ear Headphones

JVC Flats HAS160 vs Audio-Technica ATH-AR3 (2016)

Analysis:

The JVC Flats HAS160 is a great On-Ear Headphone for its $18 asking price.

The Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016), however, while a reasonable product for $103, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering On-Ear Headphones in the $110 range, you might want to check out some better options.

The JVC Flats HAS160 was loved by reviewers at CNET, a trustworthy source that performs objective hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best cheap earbuds and headphones" roundup - in fact, they named it their "Best cheap wired on-ear". That, by itself, points toward it being a noteworthy On-Ear Headphone.

Taking a look at the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - TrustedReviews and Tech Advisor - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these On-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the JVC Flats HAS160 got its highest, 8, rating from CNET, while the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) earned its best, 9, score from TrustedReviews.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the JVC Flats HAS160 and Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) managed averages of 8.0 and 9.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct JVC Flats HAS160 vs. Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.

Comparison of expert ratings
Highly Recommended
Recommended
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
CNET
TrustedReviews
Tech Advisor
Lifewire
Reddit
Tech. Specs Comparison
JVC Flats HAS160
$18
Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016)
$103
Noise-cancelling
No
No
Wireless
No
Yes
Higher than average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for On-Ear Headphones
8.0
Avg. Review Score
Score
Significantly higher than average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for On-Ear Headphones
9.0
Avg. Review Score
Score
Recommended by trusted experts
CNET
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best cheap wired on-ear
in “Best cheap earbuds and headphones” 
Last updated: 13 days ago
CNET
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The best white elephant and Secret Santa gifts for less than $10 in 2019” 
Last updated: 20 Dec 2019
Recommended by trusted experts

Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
undefinedurl nextprice drop