Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Loading
JVC Flats HAS160
Plantronics BackBeat 500
See Top Ranked On-Ear Headphones

JVC Flats HAS160 vs Plantronics BackBeat 500

Analysis:

The JVC Flats HAS160 is a great On-Ear Headphone for its $18 asking price.

The Plantronics BackBeat 500, however, while a reasonable product for $31, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering On-Ear Headphones in the $40 range, you might want to check out some better options.

The JVC Flats HAS160 was loved by reviewers at CNET, a trustworthy source that performs objective hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best cheap earbuds and headphones" roundup - in fact, they named it their "Best cheap wired on-ear". That, by itself, points toward it being a noteworthy On-Ear Headphone.

As for the Plantronics BackBeat 500 - it was really well-received by reviewers at SoundGuys, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best Headphones For Back To School 2017" roundup and was named its "Best Comfort", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like CNET, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two On-Ear Headphones best and found that the JVC Flats HAS160 got its highest, 8, review score from reviewers at CNET, whereas the Plantronics BackBeat 500 earned its best score of 8 from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the JVC Flats HAS160, with its 8.0 average, performed considerably better than most On-Ear Headphones - the mean score for the product category being 7.4 out of 10 - while the Plantronics BackBeat 500 managed an average of 7.3.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct JVC Flats HAS160 vs. Plantronics BackBeat 500 review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.

Comparison of expert ratings
Highly Recommended
Recommended
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
SoundGuys
PCmag
CNET
Techradar
TrustedReviews
Lifewire
Reddit
Tech. Specs Comparison
JVC Flats HAS160
$18
Plantronics BackBeat 500
$31
Noise-cancelling
No
No
Wireless
No
Yes
Higher than average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for On-Ear Headphones
8.0
Avg. Review Score
Score
Has average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for On-Ear Headphones
7.3
Avg. Review Score
Score
Recommended by trusted experts
CNET
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best cheap wired on-ear
in “Best cheap earbuds and headphones” 
Last updated: 11 days ago
CNET
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The best white elephant and Secret Santa gifts for less than $10 in 2019” 
Last updated: 20 Dec 2019
Recommended by trusted experts
SoundGuys
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best Comfort
in “Best Headphones For Back To School 2017” 
Last updated: 22 Aug 2017

Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
undefinedurl nextprice drop