Kingston KC2000 vs Silicon Power P34A80 Internal SSD
The Kingston KC2000 250GB makes for an outstanding Internal SSD at $78. The Silicon Power P34A80 1TB, however, while overall a good product for its asking price, doesn't quite manage to stand out from its competition - there are better Internal SSDs that can be found for around $150 available here.
The Kingston KC2000 250GB was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Internal SSDs for 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Budget Upgraders", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Silicon Power P34A80 1TB - it impressed reviewers at Tom's Hardware, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best SSDs 2020: From Budget SATA to Blazing-Fast NVMe" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Best 1TB (or Larger) Value M.2 SSD" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like Tom's Hardware, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.
Then we checked which sources liked these two Internal SSDs best and found that the Kingston KC2000 250GB got its highest, 9, review score from reviewers at PCWorld, whereas the Silicon Power P34A80 1TB earned its best score of 8 from Tom's Hardware.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Internal SSDs on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Internal SSDs being 7.8 out of 10, whereas the Kingston KC2000 250GB and Silicon Power P34A80 1TB managed averages of 8.2 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Kingston KC2000 250GB vs. Silicon Power P34A80 1TB comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.